Close

1. Identity statement
Reference TypeJournal Article
Siteplutao.sid.inpe.br
Holder Codeisadg {BR SPINPE} ibi 8JMKD3MGPCW/3DT298S
Identifier8JMKD3MGP3W/3UGCSB8
Repositorysid.inpe.br/plutao/2019/12.03.14.07   (restricted access)
Last Update2019:12.06.14.06.19 (UTC) simone
Metadata Repositorysid.inpe.br/plutao/2019/12.03.14.07.09
Metadata Last Update2022:01.04.01.31.11 (UTC) administrator
DOI10.1080/01431161.2019.1681600
ISSN0143-1161
Labellattes: 1861914973833506 2 SötheAlScLiRoBeFe:2019:CoMaDe
Citation KeySotheAlScLiCuBeFe:2020:CoMaDe
TitleA comparison of machine and deep learning algorithms applied to multisource data for a subtropical forest area classification
Year2020
Access Date2024, May 18
Secondary TypePRE PI
Number of Files1
Size3715 KiB
2. Context
Author1 Sothe, Camile
2 Almeida, Cláudia Maria de
3 Schimalski, Marcos Benedito
4 Liesenberg, Veraldo
5 Cue, Laura Elena
6 Bermudez, José David
7 Feitosa, Raul Queiroz
Resume Identifier1
2 8JMKD3MGP5W/3C9JGS3
Group1 SER-SRE-SESPG-INPE-MCTIC-GOV-BR
2 DIDSR-CGOBT-INPE-MCTIC-GOV-BR
Affiliation1 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
2 Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
3 Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
4 Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
5 Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio)
6 Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio)
7 Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio)
Author e-Mail Address1 camile.sothe@inpe.br
2 claudia.almeida@inpe.br
JournalInternational Journal of Remote Sensing
Volume41
Number5
Pages1943-1969
Secondary MarkA1_PLANEJAMENTO_URBANO_E_REGIONAL_/_DEMOGRAFIA A2_INTERDISCIPLINAR A2_GEOGRAFIA A2_ENGENHARIAS_IV A2_ENGENHARIAS_III A2_ENGENHARIAS_I A2_CIÊNCIAS_AMBIENTAIS A2_CIÊNCIA_DA_COMPUTAÇÃO B1_MATEMÁTICA_/_PROBABILIDADE_E_ESTATÍSTICA B1_GEOCIÊNCIAS B1_ENGENHARIAS_II B1_CIÊNCIAS_AGRÁRIAS_I B1_BIODIVERSIDADE B2_SAÚDE_COLETIVA B2_ODONTOLOGIA B3_CIÊNCIAS_BIOLÓGICAS_I B3_BIOTECNOLOGIA B5_ASTRONOMIA_/_FÍSICA
History (UTC)2019-12-03 15:22:37 :: lattes -> administrator :: 2019
2019-12-06 14:04:44 :: administrator -> lattes :: 2019
2019-12-06 14:06:21 :: lattes -> administrator :: 2019
2020-01-06 11:35:24 :: administrator -> simone :: 2019
2020-01-06 16:47:01 :: simone :: 2019 -> 2020
2020-01-06 16:47:02 :: simone -> administrator :: 2020
2022-01-04 01:31:11 :: administrator -> simone :: 2020
3. Content and structure
Is the master or a copy?is the master
Content Stagecompleted
Transferable1
Content TypeExternal Contribution
Version Typepublisher
Keywordsforest succession stages
endangered tree species
convolutional neural networks
ensemble methods
light detection and ranging
multispectral data
AbstractThis work explores the integration of airborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) data and WorldView-2 (WV2) images to classify the land cover of a subtropical forest area in Southern Brazil. Different deep and machine learning methods were used: one based on convolutional neural network (CNN) and three ensemble methods. We adopted both pixel- (in the case of CNN) and object-based approaches. The results demonstrated that the integration of LiDAR and WV2 data led to a significant increase (7% to 16%) in accuracies for all classifiers, with kappa coefficient (κ) ranging from 0.74 for the random forest (RF) classifier associated with the WV2 dataset, to 0.92 for the forest by penalizing attributes (FPA) with the full (LiDAR + WV2) dataset. Using the WV2 dataset solely, the best κ was 0.81 with CNN classifier, while for the LiDAR dataset, the best κ was 0.8 with the rotation forest (RotF) algorithm. The use of LiDAR data was especially useful for the discrimination of vegetation classes because of the different height properties among them. In its turn, the WV2 data provided better performance for classes with less structure variation, such as field and bare soil. All the classification algorithms had a nearly similar performance: the results vary slightly according to the dataset used and none of the methods achieved the best accuracy for all classes. It was noticed that both datasets (WV2 and LiDAR) even when applied alone achieved good results with deep and machine learning methods. However, the advantages of integrating active and passive sensors were evident. All these methods provided promising results for land cover classification experiments of the study area in this work.
AreaSRE
Arrangement 1urlib.net > BDMCI > Fonds > Produção anterior à 2021 > DIDSR > A comparison of...
Arrangement 2urlib.net > BDMCI > Fonds > Produção pgr ATUAIS > SER > A comparison of...
doc Directory Contentaccess
source Directory Contentthere are no files
agreement Directory Contentthere are no files
4. Conditions of access and use
Languageen
Target Filesothe_comparison.pdf
User Groupself-uploading-INPE-MCTI-GOV-BR
Reader Groupadministrator
simone
Visibilityshown
Archiving Policydenypublisher denyfinaldraft12
Read Permissiondeny from all and allow from 150.163
Update Permissionnot transferred
5. Allied materials
Next Higher Units8JMKD3MGPCW/3ER446E
8JMKD3MGPCW/3F3NU5S
Citing Item Listsid.inpe.br/bibdigital/2013/10.18.22.34 2
sid.inpe.br/bibdigital/2013/09.13.21.11 1
URL (untrusted data)https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01431161.2019.1681600
DisseminationWEBSCI; PORTALCAPES; COMPENDEX; SCOPUS.
Host Collectiondpi.inpe.br/plutao@80/2008/08.19.15.01
6. Notes
NotesSetores de Atividade: Atividades dos serviços de tecnologia da informação, Pesquisa e desenvolvimento científico, Produção Florestal.
Empty Fieldsalternatejournal archivist callnumber copyholder copyright creatorhistory descriptionlevel e-mailaddress format isbn lineage mark mirrorrepository month nextedition orcid parameterlist parentrepositories previousedition previouslowerunit progress project rightsholder schedulinginformation secondarydate secondarykey session shorttitle sponsor subject tertiarymark tertiarytype typeofwork
7. Description control
e-Mail (login)simone
update 


Close